The guy who introduced it to begin with, Allen George. He is also the guy who introduced it back in February in its first incarnation. That go round it was tabled three times and probably would have been tabled a fourth time except that they didn’t have enough votes to table it.
Even if they passed the ordinance, it would be meaningless, unconstitutional and moot. It only applies to casino applicants and there can be no casino applicants since CNB already has the license. There can only be ONE license.
In the EDA, the only action of the county that would result in default is:
“If the County, either through letter from the County Judge’s Office or Resolution of the Quorum Court, endorses or expresses support for any other casino license applicant during the term of this Agreement.”
and
“In the event that the County, either through letter from the County Judge’s Office or Resolution of the Quorum Court endorses or expresses support for any other casino license applicant during the term of this Agreement, this Agreement shall become voidable, at the election of the Operator, after which Operator shall no longer be bound hereunder and may continue to pursue its casino license application utilizing the Resolution of Support before the Commission.”